LawFirmCitable field guide ยท September 25, 2026
Should a Law Firm Publish Case Results to Get Cited by AI Assistants?
Why results are citation gold
When someone asks an AI assistant for a personal injury lawyer in their city, the assistant is choosing between firms that all claim to be experienced, aggressive, and client-focused. Those claims are interchangeable. A published case result is not: "a $1.2M settlement for a rear-end collision case in 2025" is a concrete fact the assistant can quote and the searcher can evaluate. Specificity wins citations, and case results are specificity in its purest form.
Results also answer the question clients actually ask, which is some version of "have you handled cases like mine, and what happened." A results page organized by practice area lets the assistant match the client's situation to your track record directly.
The rules that set the boundaries
1. Disclaimers are mandatory
Most state bars require a statement that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Put it on the results page itself, not buried in a footer three clicks away.
2. No misleading framing
Presenting a single outlier verdict as typical, or cherry-picking only wins, can violate rules against misleading advertising in many jurisdictions. Context matters.
3. Client confidentiality first
Do not publish identifying details without written client consent. Many firms anonymize results: the outcome, the case type, the year, no names.
4. State rules vary
Some states restrict testimonials and endorsements more tightly than others, and a few require filing advertising with the bar. Your state's rules govern, not general internet advice.
5. Keep claims factual
"Recovered $850,000 in a premises liability case, 2024" is a fact. "We always win big" is a claim that invites trouble. Facts get cited; puffery gets ignored.
6. Update or date them
Stale results suggest a firm living on old glory. Date every result and retire or refresh the page as new outcomes come in.
How to structure a results page for citations
One page per practice area works best, with each result as its own entry: the outcome, the case type, the year, and a sentence on what the case involved. Plain HTML text, not a PDF of a verdict sheet and not a slideshow the assistant cannot read. Group by the questions clients ask: car accidents, slip and falls, medical malpractice, each with its own results. Add the disclaimer at the top of the page and repeat it at the bottom, so no citation of the page ever travels without it.
Link each result to the relevant practice-area page. The cross-linking tells the assistant that the results belong to real, described services rather than floating numbers, and it gives human readers a path from "they won cases like mine" to "here is how they handle cases like mine."
Frequently asked questions
Can a law firm publish past case results on its website?
Yes, in most states, but attorney advertising rules require disclaimers that past results do not guarantee similar outcomes, and some states restrict how results may be presented.
Do case results help AI assistants recommend a law firm?
Yes. Specific, dated results with practice-area context give assistants concrete, quotable evidence that vague claims like "experienced attorneys" cannot match.
What is the biggest compliance risk with results pages?
Presenting results in a misleading way: cherry-picked outliers, missing disclaimers, or identifying clients without consent. When in doubt, have ethics counsel review the page.
Get the free audit
We check how AI assistants see your law firm today and tell you exactly what to fix. Free, no pitch attached.
Request the audit